The social and dharma commentary essays engage critically with contemporary issues — the decolonization of Indian thought, dharma in the blind spot of mainstream discourse, the question of atheism within a dharmika framework, and the challenges of raising children in a dharmika context.

Decolonization

Decolonization (part of the synrec corpus) argues that decolonization, like atheism, is a rejection — a creation of empty space. But unlike atheism, decolonization carries a forward implication: the empty space created must be filled with a native lens. In the Indian context, this means a Dhārmika OET (Ontology, Epistemology, Teleology) coded in the language of Sanskrit. Decolonization is the installation of an alternative psychological and cultural operating system.

The essay proposes that Indian consciousness is “arguably the most broken and ruptured” among pre-Abrahamic civilizations, having suffered incalculable ravages. The path to recovery involves synaptic reconnection — re-establishing civilizational cognition through internalizing a Sanskritic mindmap.

Dharma in the Blindspot

Hinduism in the Blindspot explores the curious absence of investigations into Hinduism and its ontology even among the free-thinking and open-minded segments of research and exploration. The essay asks why a civilization with one of the world’s most sophisticated philosophical traditions, most detailed maps of consciousness, and longest continuous history remains systematically overlooked in explorations of consciousness, psychedelics, and alternative ontologies.

Dharmika Atheism

Dharmika Atheism explores the unique position of atheism within the Indian tradition — unlike Abrahamic religions where atheism is a rejection of the entire framework, within dharma one can be an atheist (nāstika) while still operating within a dharmika worldview. The Cārvāka and Sāṅkhya schools, Jainism, and Buddhism all offer non-theistic paths within the broader Indian framework.

Other Commentary

See Also