The destruction of a mosque by a mob in 1992, in a constitutional democracy, was regrettable and should have happened differently. The democracy is held to a much higher standard than is the bigoted conqueror, and rightly so.
There was a Ram Mandir at the site, destroyed by Babur.
Ram is a national figure of pan-national relevance.
There is nothing wrong in the Supreme Court making a legal ruling on the property dispute, even if it is in favour of the “Ram-side.”
Aphorism 1 held true, India is still secular even if it does allot the site to Hindus.
The actions of aphorism 1 should never be repeated.
Additional aphorisms:
Ram Mandir today is a politically charged issue with multiple sides trying to rake political points, and in some cases successfully so.
Mandir destroyed-so mosque destroyed-so never forget: this kind of cycle can, in theory, repeat endlessly. We must be careful where to go from here.
Kashi and Mathura will also be reclaimed, even if that violatest point 1 all over again. Deal with it.